 |
Put Out Into the Deep
Bishop DiMarzio's weekly column
The Tablet
March 6, 2004
Catholics
Role in Political Life
My dear brothers and sisters in
Christ,
In November we will be going to the
polls to vote in the elections. Participation in the political life of our
country is a basic obligation of all Catholics and in a special way for the
laity themselves who may run for political office. The Holy See,
through the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued a statement in
2002 called a "Doctrinal Note regarding the participation of Catholics in
political life." The purpose of this statement is to recall the
fundamental principles that govern Christian conscience, especially in regard to
social and political involvement of Catholics in pluralistic and democratic
societies. It stresses the primary obligation of citizens and politicians
in democracies to uphold fundamental human dignity in all democratic
activities. It also emphasizes the importance of informing one's
conscience properly, not by current trends or by the media, but rather by sound
Catholic doctrine.
Respect for the human person and commitment to the common good are two
fundamental principles on which Catholic social teaching is based. Respect
for human life and protection of the family, which is founded on the union of a
man and woman, are very important fundamental rights that must be
defended. At the same time, education, protection of minors, political
freedoms, especially religious freedoms, fostering a just economy, and working
for world peace are also values that should be upheld within democratic
societies. Whatever violates the dignity of the human person, including
abortion and euthanasia, or violates the rights of the embryo, especially in
stem-cell research, as well as modern forms of slavery such as drug abuse and
prostitution, also should be the concern of Catholics holding political office
and those who vote for them.
The Church recognizes that democracy perhaps is the best expression of the
direct participation of citizens in political choices. Democracy only
succeeds, however, to the extent that it is based on a correct understanding of
the human person. In fact, it is respect for the truth about the human
person that makes democratic participation possible. Our Holy
Father, Pope John Paul II, in his encyclical, "The Splendor of Truth,"outlines
for us the basic principles of moral thinking. He states that modern
society has "detach[ed] human freedom from its essential and constitutive
relation to truth" in a way that individuals make decisions and life choices
independently of the natural law and the Church's teachings ("Veritatis
Splendor," 4). Unfortunately, in our country today we find moral and
cultural relativism, which causes some citizens to claim complete autonomy in
their moral choices and which allows politicians to enact laws which ignore the
principle of natural ethics, as if every possible outlook on life were of equal
value. Much of the Church's moral teaching is not a matter of faith or
belief, but rather is based on natural ethical principles and a proper
philosophical understanding of the nature of man. For example, the
Church's opposition to abortion is not a tenet of faith, but rather a
long-standing tradition of understanding that the human person's life begins at
conception, since what is conceived -- although passing through various stages
of human development -- is always the human person and never less than a human
person.
The
Catholic Church has long upheld the primacy of conscience and freedom in making
decisions which have moral ramifications. "[Man] must not be prevented
from acting according to his conscience, especially in religious matters"
(Catechism of the Catholic Church, n.1782). Yet, before one can act,
and because an unformed conscience can lead one to errors of judgment, the
conscience must be properly formed in accord with the true good willed by God
and aided by the authoritative teaching of the Church. Given this freedom
of conscience, Catholics may choose among political parties and may choose
strategies for promoting the common good, but may never promote laws which are
incompatible with the faith and with natural law, including those which lead to
attacks on human life. The American principle of the separation of Church
and State when misunderstood has perhaps led some to avoid forming their
consciences properly as the basis for their political participation.
In modern times, the Church has never argued that Church and State should not be
separate entities. It is impossible, however, to separate religion and
morality from our actions as citizens. Indeed, we are fortunate in a
democratic society that we are able to vote for those who reflect our moral
values. However, with this vote comes the responsibility to exercise it in
a way that is compatible with Christian values.
Perhaps most importantly the "Doctrinal Note" from the Holy See is aimed at
reminding Catholics involved in political life that they must follow a properly
formed conscience in their political activities. The document cites the
many saints that the Church venerates who have generously committed themselves
to politics and government. Most notably is St. Thomas More, who was
proclaimed patron of statesmen and politicians and who gave witness by martyrdom
to the inalienable dignity of the human conscience. St. Thomas More
refused to put the wishes of his king before the law of his God. And
so, too, we remind our Catholic politicians today, who have a tremendous burden
on their shoulders, and who many times must go against the tide, of the need to
properly form their consciences regarding the moral issues on which they
legislate. They are not asked to serve as proxies for the institutional Church,
but they are expected to bring a properly informed conscience -- enlightened by
their faith -- and a proper understanding of the human person to bear on their
political activities and votes. The fact that we live in a pluralistic
society, which must accommodate various points of view, remains for some
politicians just a convenient excuse for avoiding the moral implications of
their civic actions, since in democratic societies we are free to try to
convince others of the correctness of our position. Democracy should not
be reduced to a series of compromises which in the end becomes a substitute for
moral decision making rooted in truth.
In light of these observations, I am always troubled when a Church institution
or group grants a place of prominence, or accords an honor, to an individual in
public life whose record shows opposition to the Church's clear and consistent
teaching on human life and other moral issues. I say this mindful of concerns I
have heard expressed by members of the faithful not only in our Diocese but
elsewhere as well. In order to avoid confusion in their thinking as to the
Church's commitment to these issues, an obligation which I as Bishop view
profoundly, I ask parishes, schools, agencies and organizations in our Diocese
to respect this concern and review carefully the records of public officials,
especially Catholics, before extending invitations to them to Church
events.
Political participation is incumbent upon us as Catholic citizens. We must
support those in political life who foster a constant and comprehensive support
for the dignity of human life. Being a good citizen and a good
Catholic are one and the same. As we fulfill our civic obligations, we put
out into the deep to transform the world with values that are rooted in the
truth.
|
 |